Thursday, April 29, 2010

Functionalism and conflict theory

Functionalism and conflict theory
Main articles: Structural functionalism and Conflict theory
Structural functionalism is a broad paradigm, both in sociology and anthropology, which addresses the social structure in terms of the necessary function of its constituent elements. A common analogy (popularized by Herbert Spencer) is to regard norms, values and institutions as 'organs' that work toward the proper-functioning of the entire 'body' of society.The perspective is implicit in the original sociological positivism of Comte, but was theorized in full by Durkheim, again with respect to observable, structural laws. Functionalism shares a history and theoretical affinity with the empirical method (though some of the later functionalists, such as Bronisław Malinowski and Talcott Parsons, can be seen as partially antipositivist.Parsons, in fact, came to view the term as descriptive of a particular stage in the methodological development of the social sciences, rather than a specific school of thought .Whilst functionalism shares an affinity with 'grand theory' (e.g. systems theory in the work of Niklas Luhmann), emphasis may be placed on small units of socialization, such as the nuclear family. It is also simplistic to equate the approach directly with conservative ideologyFunctionalism has been associated with thinkers as diverse as the post-structuralist philosopher Michel Foucault.In the most basic terms functionalism concerns "the effort to impute, as rigorously as possible, to each feature, custom, or practice, its effect on the functioning of a supposedly stable, cohesive system."

No comments:

Post a Comment